跳到正文
Simon Willison's Weblog·· 3 天前精选AI 评分76

Simon Willison 评测 Gemini 4 Hydrogen:定价逻辑与生成表现对比

llm-gemini 0.37

AI 导读

Simon Willison 实测并解读了 Google 新推出的 Gemini 4 Hydrogen 模型的定价体系与生成能力。该模型输入为 $1.50/M、输出为 $7.50/M,目前仅比 Carbon 和 Argon 便宜 25% 且显著贵于同类轻量模型,实测画图质量差异明显。该模型定位为日常代码执行引擎,并将作为免费层主力支持 Google Search 的 AI 功能。

推荐理由

作者通过生成测试对比了同系三款模型的质量与代币消耗,为评估其成本效益提供了具体参考。

正文 · AI 翻译

Google 今天发布了 Gemini 4 Hydrogen,这是 Gemini 4 系列中价格最低的一款模型。

但实际上,它的价格和体量大得多的两位兄长 Carbon 与 Argon 差不了多少。我觉得 Gemini 4 的定价实在让人摸不着头脑。具体定价方案如下:

模型 日期 输入($/M) 缓存输入 输出
Gemini 4 Carbon 截至 2026 年 11 月 30 日 $2.00 $0.10 $10.00
2026 年 12 月 1 日起 $4.00 $0.20 $20.00
Gemini 4 Argon 截至 2026 年 11 月 30 日 $2.00 $0.10 $10.00
2026 年 12 月 1 日起 $4.00 $0.20 $20.00
Gemini 4 Hydrogen   $1.50 $0.075 $7.50

Carbon 和 Argon 的价格完全相同,而且计划在 12 月 1 日双双涨价一倍。既然价格一样,为什么还要推出两款不同的模型?Google 表示,与 Gemini 4 Carbon 相比,Argon「在保持 Gemini 4 级别智能的同时,响应速度更快,单轮对话消耗的 token 也更少」——也就是说,虽然单价相同,但完成每项任务消耗的 token 会更少。

Hydrogen 作为所谓的廉价款,目前比性能更强的同门机型仅仅便宜了 25%。到 12 月 1 日之后它的定价才算合理一些,届时相当于打了两五折。不过,它依然比 Claude Haiku 5.5 和 GPT-6 Luna 贵得多——后两者的价格都是 $0.10/$0.50,Hydrogen 则是它们的 15 倍。

我让 Hydrogen 生成了几只鹈鹕。这里有一份完整对比图表,展示了 Gemini 4 家族的三款模型在各自支持的三档 effort(思考强度)级别下生成的鹈鹕:

Comparison grid of nine SVG-style illustrations of a pelican riding a bicycle, three models across by three thinking levels down. Column headers: Thinking, gemini-4-carbon, gemini-4-argon, gemini-4-hydrogen. Row HIGH: gemini-4-carbon draws a detailed pelican in a sailor cap riding a red cruiser bicycle with fenders and a wicker basket holding a fish, along a beach road with sea, sun, clouds and birds, captioned 40 input tokens, 20,305 output = 20.31 cents · 4m 11s; gemini-4-argon draws a pelican in a red cap and a streaming teal striped scarf on a red bicycle with a blue fish peeking out of the basket, on a seaside promenade with a pale sun, captioned 40 input tokens, 17,158 output = 17.17 cents · 2m 29s; gemini-4-hydrogen draws a much simpler plain white pelican on a basic red bicycle against a pale blue sky with two clouds, speed lines and flat green ground, captioned 40 input tokens, 5,311 output = 3.99 cents · 19s. Row MEDIUM: gemini-4-carbon draws a pelican in a sailor cap and red striped scarf on a red bicycle with cream fenders and a basket, on a sandy beach with a rope fence and sea, captioned 40 input tokens, 11,020 output = 11.03 cents · 1m 53s; gemini-4-argon draws a pelican with an enormous orange beak, sailor cap and flowing red scarf on a teal bicycle with a basket, on a boardwalk under a purple and pink sunset sky with a large pink sun, captioned 40 input tokens, 11,090 output = 11.10 cents · 1m 32s; gemini-4-hydrogen draws a simple cream pelican on a plain red bicycle with sparse spokes, two clouds and flat green ground, captioned 40 input tokens, 3,964 output = 2.98 cents · 17s. Row LOW: gemini-4-carbon draws a pelican in a sailor cap and red and white striped scarf on a red bicycle with fenders and a basket, passing a white seaside railing on a grey road, captioned 40 input tokens, 9,153 output = 9.16 cents · 1m 34s; gemini-4-argon draws a large, chubby pelican with a sailor cap and huge orange beak on a red bicycle with a basket, gripping the handlebars with a dark blue wing, in front of an orange setting sun and a grey road, captioned 40 input tokens, 10,177 output = 10.18 cents · 1m 21s; gemini-4-hydrogen draws the simplest image, a plain white pelican on a thin red bicycle over a single green line with no scenery, captioned 40 input tokens, 2,996 output = 2.25 cents · 10s. Overall, carbon and argon produce rich, accessorised seaside scenes at every thinking level, while hydrogen produces far plainer pelicans at a fraction of the cost and time, and detail decreases for all three models as thinking drops from high to low.

考虑到它们价格如此接近,Hydrogen 生成的鹈鹕在质量上的差距可以说相当悬殊。

关于 Hydrogen 在整个产品线中的定位,Google 是这样解释的:

在真实的软件开发场景中,团队在设计系统或排查隐蔽 Bug 时,固然需要依靠 Carbon 和 Argon 这种前沿模型做出深度的架构判断,但在编写代码、运行测试和验证修改时,依然需要一个响应迅捷、执行严谨的模型。Hydrogen 既能独当一面用于日常开发,也可以与 Carbon 和 Argon 配合,作为多模型工作流中的高效执行引擎。

最值得一提的是,Hydrogen 成了新的免费层模型,未来 Google 搜索中的各项 AI 功能也将由它来驱动。

来源:Simon Willison's Weblog · simonwillison.net

EVAOO 主站实战落地 · 大模型与 AI 内容工程

看完情报?回到 EVAOO 主站直接上手工具与完整 SOP

返回 EVAOO 主站